Spasticity- pathogenesis & management:

 

Dr. A. Vincent Thamburaj,   

Neurosurgeon, Apollo Hospitals,  Chennai , India.


Spasticity can be defined as velocity dependent hypertonus seen in upper motor neuron (UMN) diseases. It manifests as resistance to passive movement, involuntary spasms, hyperactive stretch reflexes, abnormal primitive reflexes and difficulty in co-ordination of movements. As it interferes with the patient’s activities of daily living (ADL) and can cause serious disability, it constitutes a major problem for professionals who care for patients with central nervous system (CNS) pathologies.

Interference with motor mechanism resulting in spasticity can be caused by congenital disorders, cerebral palsy trauma, inflammatory or vascular lesions, multiple sclerosis, hereditary disorders, etc. After dealing with the etiological problem, the patients may be left with residual spasticity which needs to be ameliorated.

T he patients suffering from spastic disorders may have associated neurological problems or orthopedic complications such as contractures, dislocations, and deformities. A multidisciplinary rehabilitative approach is essential.

Pathogenesis of spasticity:

Normotonia is the result from a fine balance between the suprasegmental inhibitory and segmental facilitatory impulses. The gamma efferents in the anterior root carry the impulses from the motor nuclei to the muscle spindle. The muscle spindles contract and generate impulses which are carried by the gamma afferents in the posterior root to the alpha motor neurons in the anterior horn and subsequently by alpha motor fibers to the extrafusal muscle fibers to produce contraction.

 

The exact pathogenesis of spasticity is not clear. Spasticity, as a result of a variety of lesions of the cerebral cortex, brain stem or spinal cord, is presumed to be caused by involvement of the inhibitory pyramidal and parapyramidal descending tracts terminating on the spinal facilitatory myotatic reflex. A lesion of the descending tracts disturbs this equilibrium leading to spasticity. In addition, loss of supraspinal input leads to an increase in the discharge from dorsal root fibers; this results in excess of afferent impulses reaching the interneurons and anterior horn cells, resulting in their overactivity.

 

Clinical features:

 

In traumatic lesions (e.g. spinal cord injury, brain injury), spasticity evolves gradually after the spinal shock period, which is characterized by depressed reflexes and hypotonus.  In non-traumatic lesions (e.g. tumors, spondylosis), there is no period of spinal shock.

 

Its characteristic findings are abnormal resistance to passive limb movement (hypertonus) and hyperactive stretch reflexes; however not all hypertonus is spasticity. It is a velocity-dependent phenomenon that helps distinguish it from other non-velocity-dependent forms of hypertonus such as those observed in dystonias or Parkinson’s disease.

 

In general, it involves flexor muscles in upper extremities and extensors in lower extremities. In spasticity, resistance to the passive movement of a limb is maximal at the beginning of the movement and decreases as more pressure is applied.

 

Symptoms of spasticity include increased muscle tone, abnormal limb posture, excessive contraction of antagonist muscles, and hyperactive tendon reflexes. There may also be a phasic pattern of uncontrolled, sometimes violent, leg spasms that can result in fractures, dislocation and other serious injuries.

 

Spasticity may interfere with the normal control of limb position and movement, which can cause a wide range of clinical problems. The patient may complain of difficulty walking, stiffness, clonus (alternating muscle contraction and relaxation) or impaired balance.

Spasticity may not only mask residual motor function but also creates difficulty in transfer ambulation and self-care activities such as eating, grooming, dressing and toileting. It also affects patients sleep and sexual function.

There is also a risk that the patient may develop complications such as pressure sores and contractures. A contracture is caused by fibrosis of muscle or connective tissue, which produces shortening of the muscle and may result in deformity of a joint.

Evaluation:

 

Disability produced by spasticity depends on the degree to which mobility is restricted, and this varies from patient to patient.

Spasticity may sometimes help to perform certain motor activities, reduces the risk of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and edema, helps maintain bone muscle mass and locking knees during standing and walking. and should not be disturbed.

It is useful to establish the non-progressive nature of spasticity before surgical help can be offered.

In most patients the nature of the disorder is obvious, e.g. cerebral palsy.

Occasionally there may be difficulty in differentiating nonprogressive conditions like cerebral palsy from progressive metabolic or hereditary disorders. The progressive symptomatology, regression of milestones, consanguinity, family history, the clinical picture and the absence of a history of insult to the developing brain help to confirm a progressive disorder.

A detailed clinical history is essential in order to determine to what extent spasticity interferes with the patient’s ADLs and motor function and if it should be treated. 

Radiation and degree of involuntary spasms, involved muscle groups, occurrence of pain and precipitating factors should be noted.

A thorough physical examination including active and passive range of motion (ROM), deep tendon reflexes, pathological reflexes and voluntary muscle strength is carried out.  Spontaneous spasms and their distribution should be noted.

Functional impairments and improper bed or wheelchair positioning due to spasticity should be examined.

Quantification methods of spasticity consist of clinical (Ashworth scale), electroneuromyographic (H-reflex/M ratio, dynamic EMG) and biomechanical (ramp and hold test, pendulum test) analysis

 

Other quantitative methods are not widely used in daily practice as they are time consuming; require special instrumentation to give additional information.

 

Management:

The Ashworth Scale  (Ashworth, 1964).

1) No increase in tone

2) Slight increase in tone, giving a ‘catch’ when affected part is moved in flexion or extension

3) More marked increase in tone, but affected part easily flexed

4) Considerable increase in tone, passive movement difficult

5) Affected part rigid in flexion or extension.

The goal is to maximize functional capacity with minimum side effects.

The target for neurosurgical therapy and the approach must be chosen with care.

The role of the surgeon and the associate team members should be clearly defined.

The patient and the guardians must be well informed. Everyday care often falls on family and guardians, which may prove to be an emotional and financial strain. Education of both the family and patients is important. The family provide valuable opinions concerning progress and may be the first to spot worsening spasticity.

 

Before treatment is initiated, exacerbating factors and noxious stimuli should be eliminated.  This includes proper positioning, avoiding tight clothing and wrapping, treatment of urinary complications (stones, infections), proper bladder and bowel management, prevention of pressure, ulcers, contractures, and DVT.

 

Disabling spasticity is initially treated with non surgical therapies.

 

Physical Measures:

 

Physical therapy must be the first line of treatment and that medications, and other measures may added later.

Physical therapy helps to improve the strength and control of muscles.

Proper motor activity depends on adequate control of various muscles. Certain physical interventions such as positioning, splinting and casting have proved to be helpful in decreasing reflex muscle tone. Daily range of movement and stretching exercises prevent muscle shortening and contracture and reduce spasticity.

Local heat and cold applications are valuable adjuncts to other modalities.

Electrical stimulation of the peripheral nerves and muscles and biofeed back can also help spasticity reduction.

Physiotherapists and Orthotists and Occupational therapists have an important role.

Biofeedback therapy has long been used to treat various neurological problems; it has been reported to help in spasticity as well.

 

Oral medications:

 

Diazepam is the oldest antispastic agent. It enhances the action of the inhibitory neurotransmitter GABA by binding to benzodiazepine receptors coupled to GABAA receptors. It is effective in high doses.

 

Baclofen is the most widely used antispastic agent. It was introduced by Birkmayer in 1967. A structural analogue of GABA, it binds to the GABAB receptor at pre and post synaptic sites. It inhibits mono and polysynaptic transmission at spinal cord level and depresses the CNS. The net effect is inhibition of spinal reflexes. Baclofen is effective with a well-demonstrated use in MS and spinal cord injury. But it is less effective in spasticity of cerebellar origin. In patients with Parkinson's disease baclofen may interfere with dopamine metabolism, so concurrent use with levodopa should be avoided. Baclofen may also lower the seizure threshold, so caution must be taken in treating patients with epilepsy. The hypotensive effect of antihypertensive drugs (eg ACE inhibitors) may be enhanced when baclofen is used concurrently. It may be wise to avoid ibuprofen and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) during baclofen treatment. NSAIDs may cause renal insufficiency, which can decrease the renal excretion of baclofen. This increases the risk of baclofen toxicity, which presents as confusion, bradycardia, disorientation, and blurred vision.

 

Tizanidine is relatively a newer drug. The central alpha 2 adrenoceptor agonist tizanidine is a myotonolytic agent with similar efficacy to that of baclofen and a more favorable tolerability profile.

 

Dantrolene reduces calcium release in skeletal muscle and is the only antispastic agent to act peripherally. Others act on CNS. In clinical practice, dantrolene is most suited to patients with good muscle strength who are limited by their spasticity, or those with complete paralysis, such as paraplegics.

Gabapentin is emerging as a useful alternative in spasticity management. Patients may require higher doses of this drug (2700–3200 mg/d), and its safety at this level over long periods in spasticity is unknown; thus, caution is advised.

Clonidine is used only as an alternative when other medications are ineffective; its use should be limited to very resistant cases.

Fampridine-SR (sustained-release 4-aminopyridine) is a potassium-channel blocker and has recently been shown to be helpful in managing spasticity in patients with spinal cord injuries.

Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, the active ingredient in cannabis, has also been shown to be useful in spasticity.

 

All of the centrally acting drugs are sedating at therapeutic doses, and many patients cannot get adequate muscle relaxation without too much sedation.

 

Additionally, all of these medications cause weakness, so that adequate control of spasticity almost invariably causes some weakness in addition to some sedation. Care should be taken when antispastic drugs are used in combination with other CNS depressants because drowsiness and sedation may be enhanced.

 

The goal is to reduce spasticity without causing too much weakness.

The dosage has to be individualized and their liver function is monitored periodically. Withdrawal must be gradual.

Drug

Starting dose

Daily maintenance

Maximum  recommended dose/day

Diazepam

5mg nocte or 2mg bd

20-40mg

 

0-60mg

 

Baclofen

5mg tds

60-80mg

 

100mg

 

Dantrolene

25mg o.d

100mg

400mg

Tizanidine

2mg nocte

16-24mg

36mg

 

Surgical procedures:

 

Only in severe or resistant cases after other techniques have failed or patients have developed complications should it be necessary to use more advanced and specialized techniques, or to intervene surgically.

 

Shortening of the muscles and other soft tissues, dislocation or subluxation of joints, deformities, etc influence the results of surgery adversely. Various orthopedic procedures can be used including tenotomy, tendon lengthening and tendon transfers to improve function especially in cerebral palsy. Orthopedic and plastic surgeons have an important role. The improvement depends on the presence of preoperative selective control and voluntary strength in various parts of the body.

 

a) Nonablative neurosurgery:

 

Bupivacain nerve blocks on the peripheral neural structures reduce spasticity by reducing excessive gamma fusimotor drive. These procedures can also be used prior to any contemplated definitive surgery. Inaccessible nerves can be approached by an open method.

 

Botulinum toxin injection: Motor plate neurolysis using either phenol or botulinium-Phenol has been utilized successfully in selected cases for over 30 years, and provides rapid control of spasticity in a cost-effective manner and improves function.

Botulinum toxininjection is currently the favored local technique and has largely replaced the others.  It is a neurotoxin produced by the gram-positive bacterium Clostridium botulinum. There are eight antigenically different strains of botulinum toxin. Type A toxin is most commonly used because it is potent, easily crystallized and relatively stable. It is established as a treatment of blepharospasm, spasmodic dysphonia and spasmodic torticollis. It has also been used in management of cerebral palsy recently.

 

Small doses of botulinum toxin are injected directly into the overactive muscle,in the same manner as local anesthetics. A small needle is placed into the target muscle. Targeting is confirmed simply by feel in larger, more accessible muscles, or by electromyography or electrical stimulation monitoring in small or deep muscle groups. Small muscles may be injected in only 1-2 sites, while larger muscles may require 3-4 sites. While most people have no trouble tolerating the small needle punctures, local anesthetic cream or sedation is available, and may be particularly useful for children.

 

Dose dependent relaxation of the target muscle is achieved within 1-2 weeks, with little or no effect on adjacent muscles. The toxin is believed to act via three mechanisms: (a) inhibition of calcium influx (b) induction of calcium efflux (c) direct action on acetylcholine release. It is most effective in treating focused areas of spasticity. The injected muscle is paralyzed until nerve sprouting forms new neuromuscular junctions. At this point the clinical effect wears off, typically after 2-4 months, so repeated injections are required to maintain the antispastic effect. However, injection intervals must not be more frequent than once every 12 weeks to minimize the risk of non-responsiveness. Non-responsiveness is suggested to be due to the development of antibodies to the toxin. In such cases, Type B toxin may help.

 

Botulinum toxin has been evaluated in various spastic disorders, including MS, cerebral palsy and stroke. It is well tolerated and generally produces no deterioration of functional ability. Botulinum toxin A injection is safe with few side effects and a simple procedure. There is no need for precise localization (as in a nerve block), and the dosage can be easily adjusted according to the previous response. In addition, there is no sensory disturbance, and the effect is reversible after 2-3 months which may be advantageous in some cases. However, there is a small risk of inducing over weakness of the injected muscle.  In severe and widespread spasticity focal techniques may not improve function, unless they are used in combination with a global tone reduction using oral medication, or in combination with physical therapy.

 

Botulinum toxin should not be used in individuals with a known hypersensitivity to any component of the formulation, patients who have generalized disorders of muscle activity (e.g. myasthenia gravis), patients where aminoglycoside antibiotics or spectinomycin are already being used or are likely to be used, patients who have bleeding disorders of any type, and pregnant or lactating women.

 

Intrathecal baclofen: Because of poor penetrance of the blood brain barrier (BBB), intrathecal baclofen may be a useful option in those patients who cannot get adequate muscle relaxation without too much sedation. By providing a high local concentration in the lumbar cord with a very low systemic concentration, muscle relaxation can be accomplished without sedation. Since it was first proposed by Penn and Kroin in 1984, this new form of treatment, in which baclofen is delivered directly to CSF via an implantable programmable pump, had become an area of growing interest. Severe intractable spasticity refractory to other treatments can be managed with intrathecal baclofen. Under local anesthesia, an intrathecal tube is passed through the lumbar intervertebral space and left in the subarchnoid space. The other end is connected to a reservoir positioned in any convenient site in the abdominal wall. The reservoir is filled with baclofen which can be delivered to the spinal cord through a programmable pump in a smooth and sustained manner. A prior trial of intrathecal instillation of baclofen by a needle helps.

Development of intolerance is a major concern, though results of a recent study found that tolerance occurs only within the first 12 months and does not require discontinuation of the treatment.

 

Neurostimulation: Electrical stimulation of spinal cord (dorsal column and the posterior column) has a mild effect in rigidity and spasms. Electrodes are implanted at the desired level, either by open method or percutaneously under fluroscopy/CT control. The electrodes are connected to a subcutaneous reservoir. The frequency is controlled by the patient through an external stimulator(transmitter). Programmable receiver and transmitter have been devised.

The mechanism is not clear. Stimulation of descending inhibitory pathways, release of chemical substances, blockade of afferent pathways, blockade of nociceptive afferent influences on long loop reflexes, and influence on the ascending and descending reticular systems have been proposed. It is rarely used nowadays except in some cases of mild paraparesis in MS.

 

Central neurostimulation have been expensive with equivocal results.

The electrodes are positioned steretactically. Stimulation of the sensory relay nuclei of the thalamus has been tried.

The long-term results of cerebellar (cortex or dentate nucleus) stimulation are poor and the method has been abandoned.

 

b) Ablative neurosurgery:

 

Chemodenervation:

Peripheral nerve block using phenol/alcohol is a relatively old technique. Focal chemodenervation is achieved by injecting phenol 2-5 per cent into a peripheral nerve, which causes protein denaturation of nerve fibres. Peripheral nerve block may be used to manage localized spasticity as a temporary measure in spasticity following incomplete spinal cord injury.

Intrathecal alcohol and phenol may be of help in those with short life expectancy. The results are not satisfactory.

 

Neurectomy:

Selective (functional) neurectomy involves intraoperative stimulation and division of appropriate fascicles by open method. Non functional procedures have no place.

 

Rhizotomy:

Foester first performed posterior rhizotomy in 1913. In 1945, Munro described the anterior rhizotomy for marked spasticity. Fasano (1977) introduced functional posterior rhizotomy at the conus medullaris with the use of electrical stimulation of the rootlets to detect the hyperactive rootlets. Peacock (1982) modified and reintroduced selective posterior selective posterior rhizotomy at cauda equina. Rhizotomy is an open surgical technique involving multiple level laminectomy and expose the spinal cord at the appropriate levels.  After laminectomy the dura is opened and the S1 root can easily be identified as being the largest. Generally, the posterior roots are broad and flat whereas the anterior roots are smaller and rounded. In order to verify appropriate roots, intraoperative monitoring system including EMG and SEP should be placed in the appropriate dermatome and myotome.  After identification of roots is completed, involved roots are then divided.  Reports suggest a very high success with these procedures.

 

Percutaneous radiofrequency rhizotomy:

It avoids the risks of open surgery.The exact mechanism of relief of spasticity by thermocoagulation is not known. Recurrence is common; but the procedure can be repeated. CT/MRI guidance may be used.

 

DREZ lesioning:

At the dorsal root entry zone, the fine myelinated and unmyelinated nociceptive fibres and large 'A' alpha myotatic fibres are rearranged more centrally and laterally. A lesion at 45 degrees into the DREZ spares the lemniscal fibres responsible for touch and kinesthetic sensations. At open surgery, the selected posterior rootlets (as confirmed by electrostimulation of the root lets) are retracted dorsomedially and a 2mm deep incision is made at a 45 degree angle into the ventrolateral region of DREZ.

This procedure appears to be more effective in spasticity due to spinal lesions. Motor movements also may improve.

 

Percutaneous CT/MRI guided drezotomy and endoscopic techniques are increasingly being reported.

 

Longitudinal myelotomy:

Bischof (1951) introduced this procedure for the reduction of spasticity. He divided the cord into anterior and posterior halves from L1 to S1 by introducing a knife anterior to dentate ligaments and reported good results.

Pourpre  modified it. He opened the dorsal fissure and passed the knife laterally, disconnecting the dorsal and ventral horns. The corticospinal fibers were spared.

Stereotactic myelotomy, disconnecting dorsal and ventral horns, is a more finer technique. 

Endoscopic procedures have also been reported.

Myelotomy is beneficial to patients with paraplegia and painful spasticity, who do not have hope of regaining voluntary motor function  ideally. However, transections of basic pathways of spasticity are not always sufficient for complete antispastic effects. Good results after the operation may deteriorate in time.

 

Stereotactic Ventrolateral thalamotomy relieves hypertonia due to rigidity. It is not indicated for hypertonia due to spasticity alone. Stereotactic Pulvinotomy, stereotacic lesioning of Fastigeous nucleus and stereotactic Cerebellar lesions have been reported with good results in the past. Recent developments in stereotaxy may give a fresh lease to these procedures.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

from Peer Reviewed Resources only

 

  Share